WHY IS SPIRITUALITY MARGINALIZED? CRITIQUE ON NEW DEFINITION OF HEALTH IN THE MODERN MEDICINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67281/issue.v2i2.19Keywords:
Modern Medicine, Spirituality, Health Definition, Islamic View, PsychologyAbstract
New definition of health includes spiritual aspect of human being as an important dimension. In this approach, health defined as a bio-psycho-socio-spiritual phenomena so that if all of these dimensions are in a normal condition then we can say a person is healthy. In this framework, spiritual dimension as an ignored aspect is scrutinized. Although this approach is a step forward about definition of health, but it includes some defects. This is due to the modern wisdom that has penetrated into medicine; in turn, any illnessess was managed into secular context. Due to this, the totality of spirituality as a main dimension of human being reduced to one of its function that is related to its role in physical and psychological health. So, ontological dimension of spirituality was declined into limited function. In this reductionism, spirit ignored and medicine focuses on the limited role of spirituality in health. Because of this, medicine confronts with these problems: 1. It doesn’t pay any attention to the human beings and his/her dependency to the cosmic order; 2. Medicine is more functional than relational so, that the importance of spirituality is due to its function not to its relations with the human beings and his/her interpretation of cosmic order; 3. Despite the acceptance of spiritual dimension, medicine likewise is one-dimensional. This one-dimensional approach leads to many failures in diagnosis and treatment; and 4. Due to its secular context, modern medicine doesn’t pay any attention to totality of spirit that called human soul. As a proposed model, Islamic view has holistic approach that its' definition of health is in relation with the Ultimate Reality and his Will. This paper is a documented study to evaluate the above characteristics.
References
Airhihenbuwa, Collins O. 1995. Health and culture: Beyond the Western paradigm. London: SAGE Publications.
Armstrong, David. 1994. “Bodies of Knowledge/Knowledge of Bodies”. In C. Jones and R. Porter (eds.). Reassessing Foucault: Power, Medicine and the Body. London: Routledge.
Astrow, Alan B., Christina M. Pulchalski, and Daniel P. Sulmasy. (2001). “Religion, Spirituality, and Health Care: Social, Ethical, and Practical Considerations”. American Journal of Medicine 110: 283-287.
Choudhury, Masudul Alam. 1998a. Studies in Islamic Social Sciences. London: Macmillan Press LTD
———. 2000b. “Regulation in the Islamic Political Economy: Comparative Perspectives”. J.KAU: Islamic Econ 12: 21-51.
———. 2002c. Explaining the Qur’an Books I and II. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
———. 2006d. The Koranic Principle of Complementarities Applied to Social and Scientific Themes, Science and Epistemology in the Qur’an. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Cimons, Marlene. 2008. “The Medicalization of Menopause: Framing Media Messages in the Twentieth Century”. Dissertation, Maryland: University of Maryland. Accessed March 2, 2014. http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/8352/1/umi-umd-5616.pdf .
Conrad, Peter. 2005. “The Shifting Engines of Medicalization”. J Health Soc Behav. 46: 3-14.
Driver, Felix. 1994. “Bodies in Space: Foucault’s Account of Disciplinary Power”. In C. Jones and R. Porter (eds.). Reassessing Foucault. Power, Medicine and the Body. London: Routledge.
Diwani, Rachida. 2005. “Health Issues in Islam”. Islam and Greek Philosophy 3 (2): 1–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/110.21043/equilibrium.v3i2.1268.
Dogar, Imtiaz Ahmad. 2007. “Biopsychosocial Model”. APMC-Annals of Punjab Medical College 1 (1): 11- 13.
Dubos, René. 1959. Mirage of health. New York: Harper & Row.
Foucault, Michel. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. England: Tavistock Publications Limited.
Govender, Veloshnee and Loveday Penn-Kekana. 2010. “Challenging Gender in Patient-Provider Interactions”. In Gita Sen & Piroska Östlin (eds.). Gender Equity in Health: The Shifting Frontiers of Evidence and Action. New York: Routleged.
Green, Lawrence W. 2014. “Definition of Health”. Oxford Bibliographies. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756797/obo-9780199756797-0132.xml.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hatala, A. R. 2013. “Towards a Biopsychosocial–Spiritual. Approach in Health Psychology: Exploring Theoretical Orientations and Future Directions”. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health 15 (4): 256-276.
Hill, Peter C., Kenneth I. Pargament, Ralph W. Hood, Michael E. McCullough, James P. Swyers, David B. Larson, and Brian J. Zinnbauer. 2000. “Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality: Points of Commonality, Points of Departure”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 30 (1): 51-77.
Iman, M. T. and Ahmad K. Sadati. 2014. Methodology of Human Science in the Views of Muslim Scholars. Qom: Hawza and Daneshgah Pub.
James A. Marcum (ed.). 2008. Humanizing Modern Medicine: An Introductory Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
Kaiser, Leland R. 2000. “Spirituality and the Physician Executive: Reconciling the Inner Self and the Business of Health Care”. The Physician Executive 26 (2): 6-13.
Khoshtinat , V. 2012. “A Comparison between Islamic Ideology and Other Schools Theories about Mental Health and the Impact of Religious and Spirituality on Human Psychology and Drug Rejection.” International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3 (8): 1744-1754.
McBrien, B. 2006. “A concept analysis of spirituality”. Br J Nurs 15 (1): 42-5.
McGowen, R. 1994. “Power and Humanity, or Foucault Among the Historians”. In Colin Jones and Roy Porter (eds.). Reassessing Foucault. Power, Medicine and the Body. London: Routledge.
Mohr, W. (2006). “Spiritual Issues in Psychiatric Care”. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 42 (3): 174-183.
Pellegrino, Edmund D. and David C. Thomasma. 1988. For the Patient’s Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press.
Puchalski, Christina M. 2008. “Spirituality and the Care of Patients at the End-of-Life: An Essential Component of Care”. OMEGA: Journal of Death and Dying 56 (1): 33-46.
Sadati, Ahmad K. et al. 2014. “Religion as an Empowerment Context in the Narrative of Women with Breast Cancer”. Journal of Religion and Health 54: 1068–1079.
Scambler, G. 2005. “Habermas and the Power of Medical Experties”. In G. Scambler (eds.). Medical Sociology: Major Themes in Health and Social Welfare. USA: Routledge.
———. 2001. “Introduction: unfolding themes of an incomplete project”. In G. Scambler (eds.). Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routlege.
Scrambler, G. and N. Britten. 2001. “System, Lifeworld and Doctor–Patient Interaction: Issues of Trust in a Changing World.” In G. Scambler (eds.). Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London: Routledge.
Sulmasy, D. P. 2002. “A Biopsychosocial-Spiritual Model for the Care of Patients at the End of Life”. Gerontologist 3: 24-33.
Tom Wolff. 2008. “Spirituality and Social Change: Appreciation, Acceptance, Compassion, and Interdependence in Our Community Work”. A Newsletter from Tom Wolff and Associates. Spring.
World Health Organization. 1948. WHO Definition of Health, Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization. Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100. Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19–22, 1946, and signed on July 22, 1946, by representatives of 61 states. Entered into force on April 7, 1948. In Frank P. Grad. 2002. “The Preamble of the Constitution of the World Health Organization”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 80 (12): 982.
